“Before COVID, if I said we need to reproduce or scale, people would ask, why?” says Doug Densmore, Co-Founder of Lattice Automation and Asimov. “Now, people get it.”The consequence? An automated revolution in biotechnology, where cheap computing meets mass-reproducible synthetic biology, begetting an industry with the potential to surpass anything that went before it. The opportunity is tantalising, the prospect mouthwatering.
“We’re taking the tenants in big biology; abstraction, modularity, standards, composition; and making that discipline computational,” says Densmore, who believes there are huge dividends to be reaped for whoever can truly embrace the potential of computational synthetic biology. “We’re trying to make a core engine for biology, to build a base of common software.“That's how standards emerge. If everyone's making it compatible, that's how things start to connect.”Densmore likens the current situation in biology to Moore’s law of integrated circuits for silicon chip design — the cost of DNA sequencing and synthesis is rapidly decreasing while the platforms that automate the processes continue to proliferate and improve in efficiency, reproducibility and affordability. This, he says, provides a fertile playground for responsible tinkering - and a huge opportunity.“I'm talking about the play of engineering. What if I put these two parts together? Oh, that works just like Legos. And then when you're done playing, responsibly — a keyword, we need to do this in a safe and ethical way — then you write rules down.” Densmore suggests. “It's going to be an interesting change in the way people think.”“You don't hear much in synthetic biology, except, ‘let me simulate this system.’ I think that's part of it, but how do we forward engineer it?” He challenges. “I don’t think anyone has figured it out, but I think that could be really powerful.”
In Densmore’s lab, the constraint of size and toxicity in single cells means that play of engineering genetic circuits and proteins is limited — and microfluidics are high on his wishlist of future advances in synthetic biology.“We’ve looked at ways to partition circuits, making them smaller and putting them in multiple cells and doing intracellular communication,” he tells me, contemplating how that might work. “The way we want to do that is take the cells in that community and put them in a microfluidic that we fabricate as well.”Harking back to his electrical engineering background, Densmore envisions a time when, in the same way you might order a PCB today, you could get on-demand fabrication circuits for microfluidics. “It’d be like a breadboard for biology. If you could describe the environmental setup that you want to replicate, and then get a chip that implements that, that would be neat.”
Follow me on LinkedIn. Check out my website.
Originally Published on Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2020/11/06/where-biology-and-computers-combine-trillions-await-those-who-can-scale-up-an-interview-with-lattice-automation-co-founder-doug-densmore/
“Before COVID, if I said we need to reproduce or scale, people would ask, why?” says Doug Densmore, Co-Founder of Lattice Automation and Asimov. “Now, people get it.”The consequence? An automated revolution in biotechnology, where cheap computing meets mass-reproducible synthetic biology, begetting an industry with the potential to surpass anything that went before it. The opportunity is tantalising, the prospect mouthwatering.
“We’re taking the tenants in big biology; abstraction, modularity, standards, composition; and making that discipline computational,” says Densmore, who believes there are huge dividends to be reaped for whoever can truly embrace the potential of computational synthetic biology. “We’re trying to make a core engine for biology, to build a base of common software.“That's how standards emerge. If everyone's making it compatible, that's how things start to connect.”Densmore likens the current situation in biology to Moore’s law of integrated circuits for silicon chip design — the cost of DNA sequencing and synthesis is rapidly decreasing while the platforms that automate the processes continue to proliferate and improve in efficiency, reproducibility and affordability. This, he says, provides a fertile playground for responsible tinkering - and a huge opportunity.“I'm talking about the play of engineering. What if I put these two parts together? Oh, that works just like Legos. And then when you're done playing, responsibly — a keyword, we need to do this in a safe and ethical way — then you write rules down.” Densmore suggests. “It's going to be an interesting change in the way people think.”“You don't hear much in synthetic biology, except, ‘let me simulate this system.’ I think that's part of it, but how do we forward engineer it?” He challenges. “I don’t think anyone has figured it out, but I think that could be really powerful.”
In Densmore’s lab, the constraint of size and toxicity in single cells means that play of engineering genetic circuits and proteins is limited — and microfluidics are high on his wishlist of future advances in synthetic biology.“We’ve looked at ways to partition circuits, making them smaller and putting them in multiple cells and doing intracellular communication,” he tells me, contemplating how that might work. “The way we want to do that is take the cells in that community and put them in a microfluidic that we fabricate as well.”Harking back to his electrical engineering background, Densmore envisions a time when, in the same way you might order a PCB today, you could get on-demand fabrication circuits for microfluidics. “It’d be like a breadboard for biology. If you could describe the environmental setup that you want to replicate, and then get a chip that implements that, that would be neat.”
Follow me on LinkedIn. Check out my website.
Originally Published on Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2020/11/06/where-biology-and-computers-combine-trillions-await-those-who-can-scale-up-an-interview-with-lattice-automation-co-founder-doug-densmore/